Fooling Pairs in Randomized Communication Complexity
نویسندگان
چکیده
The fooling pairs method is one of the standard methods for proving lower bounds for deterministic two-player communication complexity. We study fooling pairs in the context of randomized communication complexity. We show that every fooling pair induces far away distributions on transcripts of private-coin protocols. We use the above to conclude that the private-coin randomized ε-error communication complexity of a function f with a fooling set S is at least order log log |S| ε . This relationship was earlier known to hold only for constant values of ε.The bound we prove is tight, for example, for the equality and greater-than functions. As an application, we exhibit the following dichotomy: for every boolean function f and integer n, the (1/3)-error public-coin randomized communication complexity of the function ∨n i=1 f(xi, yi) is either at most c or at least n/c, where c > 0 is a universal constant.
منابع مشابه
Information theory and Communication Complexity - Lecture 2
3 The randomized communication complexity of Disjointness 8 3.1 High level idea of the proof reduction to internal information of AND . . . 8 3.2 The Internal Information of AND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 3.2.1 Divergence and Statistical Distance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 3.2.2 High level idea of the proof . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 3.2...
متن کاملLecture 18 - 19 : Communication complexity lower bounds
In the previous lecture we discussed the fooling set method for proving lower bounds on deterministic communication complexity. In this lecture we’ll see two more ways we can prove these lower bounds: the Rectangle Size Method and the Rank Method. Both of these are stronger than the fooling set method. We’ll show Ω(n) lower bounds for the dot product function with both methods while the fooling...
متن کاملHellinger distance
In this lecture, we will introduce a new notion of distance between probability distributions called Hellinger distance. Using some of the nice properties of this distance, we will generalize the fooling set argument for deterministic protocols to the randomized setting. We will then use this to prove a Ω(n) lower bound for the communication complexity of Disjointness. We will also see how this...
متن کاملFooling One-Sided Quantum Protocols
We use the venerable “fooling set” method to prove new lower bounds on the quantum communication complexity of various functions. Let f : X × Y → {0, 1} be a Boolean function, fool1(f) its maximal fooling set size among 1-inputs, Q1(f) its one-sided-error quantum communication complexity with prior entanglement, and NQ(f) its nondeterministic quantum communication complexity (without prior enta...
متن کاملSome notes on two lower bound methods for communication complexity
We compare two methods for proving lower bounds on standard two-party model of communication complexity, the Rank method and Fooling set method. We present bounds on the number of functions f(x, y), x, y ∈ {0, 1}n, with rank of size k and fooling set of size at least k, k ∈ [1, 2n]. Using these bounds we give a novel proof that almost all Boolean functions f are hard, i.e., the communication co...
متن کامل